Ever since The New York Times opened its archives to one and all, journalist Jeremy Olshan has jubilantly mined its riches "to prove that everything news is old." Derek Jeter strays into a tax mess? Big whoop! The ball players and umps from 1919 found themselves in a just such a brouhaha. Alarmed over reports of a tsunami smacking the East Coast? Readers were similarly rattled, back in 1878. School officials and teachers tussle over tenure? Yeah, we've heard it before—the year we entered World War I. And, just to prove the steadiness of the New York character, a recent post covering "umbrella umbrage" on Manhattan's sidewalks reminds us that "New Yorkers have been whining in the rain for more than 75 years." Thank heavens for a little consistency.
Filed under: Blogs, News, Media, Newspapers
After Howard Dean astonished the politerati by, gasp, using the Web in 2004, no candidate was going to get caught without an extensive online presence this time around. Neither was any news portal going to withstand the campaign season without launching at least one flashy interactive tool. Among some of the latest online endeavors, we like the Candidate Mashup from our own Yahoo! News (currently Democrats-only) and the Issue Coverage Tracker at Washingtonpost.com.
Drawing from online sources that include news organizations, bloggers, and interest groups, the Post's tracker pulls in commentary and coverage of the presidential race, and then presents the "mentions" in a way that shows graphically who's taking the most heat on what. Scroll over John McCain, for example, and see what issues are most associated with his name in online chatter (immigration, Iraq). Or look at hot button topics like abortion (Giuliani, Thompson) or Iraq (Clinton, Obama) for the candidates who are kicking up the most buzz. Click further and the tracker will dispatch you to the original sources. This is a snazzy piece of web design—and a refreshing way to see how the candidates are being assessed and critiqued online.
Filed under: Politics, News, Media, U.S. Elections
Shortly after Gawker Media—the rudest kids on the blogging block—launched a web site focused on women's media, we knew there was going to be some mudpack-slinging ahead in the world of women's magazines. And it wasn't long before Jezebel's editors announced they would pay handsomely for real evidence of the airbrushing chicanery that goes into the covers of magazines like Vogue, Elle, Glamour, and Redbook. That day has arrived, and one sneaky Jezebel reader grew $10,000 richer while the rest of us grew a bit wiser about Photoshop foolery in the media. Compare the original Redbook cover photo to its digitally-enhanced alter ego. Did beautiful, 39-year-old country singer Faith Hill really need to have a few lines erased, a hand transformed into an arm, another appendage digitally liposuctioned, and a myriad other mutations? The outcry about this muckraking has been loud, if not entirely clear. Could this be the end of the airbrush apparent? If Jezebel keeps it up, maybe someday you can start really judging a Redbook by its cover.
Filed under: Television, Media, Classic TV
Filed under: Politics, Television, News, Media
Yahoo!'s crack team of editors serves up the coolest, funniest, or quirkiest sites we encounter on the Web. Got a favorite new link of your own? Share it with us!